Solomon:
mighty king, wisest of men, master magician, lord of 1000 jinn. Solomon plays a
much larger role in Islam than he does in Christianity where his role as a
magician is largely understated. The major focus of his magical work was on the
jinn, spirits whose primary essence is fire. The relationship between Solomon
and the jinn plays a role in Islamic theology, magic and literature. This
relationship appears in numerous aspects of classical Islamic life and is
therefore worthy of examination. The submission of the jinn to Solomon is a
realization of the first interactions between Adam and the jinn. Solomon ruled
the jinn justly and wisely, demonstrating the wisdom and power that can be
given to those who submit to the will of God. The Islamic Solomon could not
have been who he was without his work with the jinn and the jinn were forever
afterwards shaped by the man who commanded them all.
Solomon
was the son of David by Bathsheba and ruled the Israelites in the mid-10th
century BCE. He received many gifts from God for his piety including an
understanding of all the languages of the world, including those of all the
animals. He also received the gifts of wisdom, dominion over human kings, and
control over the jinn. He used the jinn in a number of ways, both for transport
and for the construction of public works. The jinn carried Solomon on a
magnificent carpet whenever he traveled and when he demanded the presence of
Bilquis, the Queen of Sheba, it was two ifrits who conveyed her throne to
Jerusalem. The jinn also played a major role the the public works that Solomon
constructs in Jerusalem, most prominently the Temple. In the Islamic tradition
the Temple in Jerusalem was built with jinnic and demonic labor. While Solomon
commanded both jinn and demons to work on the temple, the jinn did not perform
the menial tasks of quarrying and preparing the stone. The jinn were primarily craftsmen;
they worked on the metal domes and the art work of the Temple. The jinn were
known for their skill with metal, unsurprising for spirits of fire. The jinn
had many associations with metalworking, both artistically and functionally. In
fact, there are several places in pre Islamic poetry where legendary swords are
attributed to jinn craftsmen.
Officially
Solomon is not described as a magician; that term has a negative connotation in
orthodox Islam. This is because of the problem of reconciling the power that a
magician has with the submissive attitude that is central to Islam. This
negative association with magic was shared by the other two Abrahamic religions
in the Middle Ages and prejudices against magic exist to this day. The conflict between magic and religion arises
from the different attitudes that are required for magic and religion.
Generally, religion is more passive, things happen to a believer, and magic is
more active, a magician acts upon the world. However, as Solomon demonstrates,
it is possible to reconcile the two worldviews.
Solomon,
as a prophet and one who is beloved to God, is aware of where his power
originates and therefore avoids those negative aspects that Muslims associate
with magic. His faith is reinforced by several Qur’anic stories, including the
period in which he was temporarily deposed by Sakhr the Rebellious, a jinni who
caused problems at several points throughout Solomon’s reign. These instances,
particularly when Solomon is temporarily deposed by Sakhr the Rebellious, in
which God reasserts Solomon’s humility serve as a reminder that even those to
whom God gives many gifts must be as submissive as every being in the universe.
The
state of submission is central to Islam and Solomon provides a wonderful
example of the struggle for submission. Bowing completely to the will of
another being, even the almighty ruler of the universe is incredibly difficult
and requires a lot of will power. Solomon’s struggle and his occasional
failures must have struck a chord with many early Muslims. Their own struggles
with the demands that God had placed on them must have seemed more bearable
when there was an example of one of God’s beloveds who likewise had
difficulties with submission. Solomon’s
eventual triumph, reclaiming the throne in Jerusalem, demonstrated the rewards
that God bestowed on those with the willpower and submissive attitude demanded
in Islam. In many ways, that makes Solomon a more human figure than some of the
other prophets who were more perfect in their devotion.
Solomon’s role as a magician also plays a major role in
medieval Judeo-Christian magic, particularly in the grimoire tradition of high
magic. A grimoire is a magical text, an instruction manual for performing
spells and working magic. Grimoires are a major primary source that scholars have
for studying magic in the Middle Ages, both in Europe and the Islamic world. Manuscripts
in Greek, Latin and Hebrew from the 14th- 17th centuries
claim to be transmissions of magical texts written by Solomon. While these
manuscripts could not have been penned by Solomon, there are textual
conventions that would not have been used in 9th BCE century Israel.
However, their existence is indicative of a tradition in medieval Europe that
links Solomon with magic. One of the latest of these manuscripts is the Lesser Key of Solomon, which first
appeared in the 17th century. The Lesser Key of Solomon is a
manual for raising spirits and binding them to the service of the magician. The
Lesser Key of Solomon is particularly
similar to the Islamic stories in which Solomon binds some rebel jinni in a jar
or other vessel. The Lesser Key describes
72 spirits that Solomon trapped in a vessel of brass.
While the European text does not describe the spirits as
jinn, they are as close as a Christian context allows. The spirits in the Lesser Key are goetic spirits, beings
that can be conjured by “goetia” or magical techniques that use material
elements to persuade spirits to do the bidding of the magician. They are among
the nobility of Hell, spirits who inhabit the realm of flame. The similarities
between the entities named in the Lesser
Key and the jinn are strengthened when one looks at the social structures
in place in jinnic and goetic societies. Like the goetic spirits, the jinn live
in a monarchial society, under the leadership of 10 kings of the jinn. For
example, in “The Tale of Kamar al-Zaman” the jinniyah Maymunah is a daughter of
al-Dimiryat, a “renowned King of the Jann” (Burton 171).While the goetic
spirits in the Lesser Key are demons,
the jinn are not. It is important to understand that using the term “demon” to
describe the jinn is a misnomer. While the Greeks used the word to describe all
spirits, good and evil, our understanding and the one that occasionally appears
in translations of the Arabian Nights associates
the word with exclusively wicked spirits. As we have seen, this is not the case
with the jinn. An unnamed jinniyah in “The Tale of Nur al-Din Ali and his Son
Badr al-Din Hasan” is a Muslim, a “True Believer”. Therefore, the jinn are not
bound to evil or iniquity, but rather possess free will as humans do and can be
good or evil. Just as a fire can protect or destroy, so can the jinn be good or
evil. A tendency to assign malignant terminology to these spirits represents a
fundamental misunderstanding of their essence and cosmological role in the
universe. There is a clear distinction between demons and jinn in classical
Islamic writings. In fact Lives of the Prophets, the text that I
used for Solomon’s biography makes clear the distinction between jinn and
demons by seating the jinn on iron benches and the demons on brazen benches at
Solomon’s table.
The
relationship between Solomon and the jinn extends beyond the realms of the
theological and magical. Solomon plays a major role in many of the stories that
feature jinn in 1001 Arabian Nights. It
is important to realize that works of literature and folklore can prove just as
valuable as Qur’anic and hadith literature in the study of the jinn. Arabian Nights serves as one of the most
valuable sources of knowledge about the jinn. Like most fairytales, the stories
in 1001 Arabian Nights were composed
anonymously and were only collected because they were so widely told. They are
the Grimms’ of the Islamic world and represent public understanding about the
jinn, magic, and the fantastical. In that light, they are an invaluable asset
in any study of the jinn and the role they played in classical Islam.
The
jinn appear in a particularly major role in the frame narrative told by
Scheherazade, “The Fisherman and the Jinni”. In this tale a fisherman draws a
brass vessel sealed with lead and marked by the Seal of Solomon. When he opens
the jar a huge jinni emerges. This unnamed jinni, an ally of Sakhr, the jinni
who initially refused to serve Solomon, was one of several that Solomon locked
up as punishment, similar to the 72 spirits detailed in the Lesser Key of Solomon. Solomon’s assessment
of the spirit seems to have been accurate: the jinni’s plan is to kill the
first person he sees after being released. While the unnamed jinni claims that
in the first 500 years of his imprisonment he would have been merciful to his
liberator, the next 500 years have pushed him over the edge. Luckily, as all too
often happens in literary and folkloric interactions between humans and jinn,
the fisherman is able to use his wits and escape the jinn, using the same
techniques that Scheherazade uses to preserve her own life: guile and
storytelling.
“The
Tale of Kamar al-Zaman” also shows one of the aspects of the relationship
between Solomon and the jinn. When Maymunah calls the Ifrit Dahnash ibn
Shamhurish, he beseeches her to be merciful in the name of God as it appears on
the seal of Solomon’s signet ring. The ring was used to bind many jinn into the
service of a human king. Beyond the mystical power it commanded, the ring served
as an emblem of power, but more importantly of the grace and mercy of God as
seen through his servant, Solomon. This means many Muslims, the people who
would have heard the tales and retold them shaping them into the collected work
1001 Arabian Nights held that Solomon
was as just as he was wise. The tales
demonstrate that he treated even his slaves with the dignity that their power
merited.
As
“The Tale of Kamar al-Zaman” indicates, much of Solomon’s power is tied to his
ring. Solomon’s ring appears throughout the Islamic-Judeo-Christian world. The
grimoires described the ring as being adorned with a seal that bears several
names of god. The Islamic description of the ring is similar; that ring has a
four pointed seal, each side of which bears a different name for God and
represents a different aspect of Solomon’s dominion. The sides show his dominion
over the jinn, animals, human kings and creatures of the sea.
There
are rings other than Solomon’s that have power over the jinn in Islamic
folklore, including a ring that plays a major role in one of the most
well-known of the tales in Arabian Nights.
No discussion of the jinn would be complete without a treatment of the tale of “Aladdin
and the Wonderful Lamp”, which is among the most popular and misused tales in
the Arabian Nights. In the original
tale, there are two jinn, one bound in a ring and a more powerful jinni bound
in an oil lamp. These jinn are bound to serve their master completely without the
“three wishes” limitation that has appeared so often in popular culture in
recent years. In the original story the jinn play a similar role to that played
by the jinn in building the Temple of Jerusalem. These jinn obey their master
without question or impudence.
It is interesting to look at the differences
between the jinn in “Aladdin and the Wonderful Lamp” and the jinni in “The
Fisherman and the Jinni”. The two jinn in “Aladdin and the Wonderful Lamp” are
not released from imprisonment when they leave their vessel. This likely
represents a different binding used by the magician who bound these jinn in
their respective prisons. It would seem that the unnamed magician or magicians
responsible for those bindings was not a merciful as Solomon, who despite
trapping the jinni in the vessel of brass for 1,800 years, did not bind him to
the vessel perpetually as these two jinn seem to be. The tale does not address
either of their fates or indeed their origins and how they came to be bound in
the ring and the lamp. The temporary punishments that Solomon uses on rebel
slaves speaks to the mercy that he exhibits toward that jinn in his service.
While there are some who are punished for misbehavior, by and large Solomon
seems to have treated the jinn justly.
Having
looked at the relationship that Solomon had with the jinn, it is also important
to look at what the jinn are and their larger role in Islamic cosmology. This
adds dimension to the relationship. First and foremost, the jinn are not material
in the same way that humans are. Their fundamental essence is of smokeless
fire. The jinn possess free will, but are more proud than humans are. That is in
part why they are sometimes described as demons. Most resent submitting to
humans and only do so under duress or at the command of God and his prophets.
For a parallel within “western” culture, the jinn are most similar to fairies
in Celtic mythology. Both are understood to be whimsical and mischievous, both
are very dangerous. Both are maligned as wicked and have now been made
nonthreatening in popular culture.
There
are several classes of jinn, including most prominently the Ifrit and the
Marid. The Ifrit, huge jinn who almost exclusively manifest as giants, are mentioned
once in the Qur’an, Solomon tasks one with bringing the throne of the Queen of
Sheba from Sheba to Jerusalem. Marids frequently appear in extra-Qur’anic
stories featuring Solomon, particularly those in 1001 Arabian Nights. It seems that jinn can belong to both classes
as the jinni released by the fisherman in “The Fisherman and the Jinni” is
referred to as an Ifrit, but the fisherman addresses him as a Marid. It is
unclear whether the fisherman is unaware of a difference between the classes,
is attempting to use the term as an honorific or whether the jinni is both a
Marid and an Ifrit. There are also ghuls and shaytans, which are in the camp of
Iblis and are almost exclusively described as wicked. The ghuls are desert scavengers who will fall
upon wayward travelers and the shaytans are tempters, who work to draw
believers away from Islam.
Not
only do the jinn have monarchies as humans and the goetic spirits do, they also
live lives very similar to humans in a number of other aspects. The jinn are
mortal, as are all beings other than God, though they are incredibly long
lived. They marry and have children. They have jobs and wage wars and create
works of art. This is a far cry from the free will lacking angels who spend the
whole of their existence perpetually singing the praises of God. There is even
a tradition in which every person has a three doubles in the universe: a star
in the sky, a leaf on the Tree of Life and a jinni known as a qarin.
Purportedly, your qarin’s life will double yours exactly, they will have
children when you have children, and will die when you die. Some traditions
claim that your qarin is in the camp of Iblis and is a personal tempter, but
others just acknowledge the existence of these spirit doubles without attaching
any moral judgment to them.
The
smokeless fire of which the jinn are composed also affects the interactions
between humans and the jinn. For example, the consensus of the stories in 1001 Arabian Nights is that humans are
better than the jinn, for all their power. Humans inevitably come out as the
victors in a conflict. Even if the jinni or jinniyah in question has had many
other victims of his or her ire, the clever hero will be able to outwit or
overcome the jinni. The tendency of
humans to outwit or overpower jinn is usually explained by the use of water in
the creation of mankind. Humans, made of earth or mud, possess the power to
quench the smokeless fire of the jinn. In a desert culture, water is life. For
all of the power and awe that fire can inspire, water is the source of all life
and is the most valuable resource a society can have.
Popularly,
at least according to 1001 Arabian Nights,
there are jinn who are also Muslims. In “The Tale of Nur al-Din Ali and his Son
Badr al-Din Hasan” Badr al-Din Hasan falls asleep on his father’s tomb and is
taken from there by a jinniyah on a bet with one of her fellow jinn that there
is a woman in Cairo who is equal to the youth in beauty. The text is clear that
the jinn who frequent this cemetery are of the “True Believers” (Burton 119).
The possibility that jinn have free will and use it to submit to God indicates
that the jinn are not fundamentally wicked, as some may suggest. The belief
that the jinn are wholly wicked is largely based on the belief that Iblis, the
Islamic Satan is a rebel jinni (18:48). Iblis had been among the jinn who were
“True Believers”, but when God created Adam, Iblis refused to submit. He
gathered the wicked jinn who would not acknowledge the supremacy of man and
rebelled from God. This shares a number of details with the Christian belief
about the Fall of Satan, but because Islamic angels do not possess free will,
it would be impossible for an angel to rebel and subsequently fall from the
grace of God. Only beings capable of free agency have the capacity to disobey
and thereby rebel against the will of God.
The
relationship between the three intelligences extends beyond their agency of
free will. There are parallels to be drawn between the relationships between
humans, jinn, and angels and the three alchemical principles: Salt, Mercury,
and Sulfur. Humans, made of earth, can be understood as Salt, the material
body. Angels can be associated with Sulfur, the soul, the higher principle.
Jinn serve as intermediaries between the two, neither wholly of the material
world nor of the spiritual world. They are like Mercury, the animating force,
the spirit. Jinn, made of fire, are denser than light and less than earth. They
share properties of the other two beings, while retaining individual traits of
their own. These parallels reflect the interactions between alchemy and
theology in the classical Islamic world. Alchemy experienced a Golden Age in medieval
Islam and the spiritual aspects of alchemy were in part informed by Islam. It
is likely that aspects of Alchemical philosophy also helped to shape some of
the ideas that Muslims had about cosmology. As we discussed in class, Muslim
philosophy is largely Neoplatonic and alchemy and the other two hermetic arts:
magic and astrology are built on similar philosophical principles.
An
understanding of Solomon as Magician cannot be undertaken unless it is paired
with an examination of the spirits he worked most closely with in the Qur’an
and Islamic folklore: jinn. An analysis of the role of the jinn in Islamic
cosmology and the relationships that they have with humans and with God helps us
understand how they worked with Solomon and why the work he did with them, most
prominently the construction of the Temple in Jerusalem, was believed to be
possible.
Sources
Cited
al-Kisai, Muhammad ibn Abd Allah . Tales of the Prophets. 1st.
Chicago: KAZI Publications, 1997. 19-23, 288-321. Print.
Amira, El-Zein. Islam, Arabs, and the
Intelligent World of Jinn. 1st . Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2009.
Print.
Skinner, Stephen. The Complete Magician's Tables.
3rd. Woodbury, Minnesota: Llewellyn Worldwide, 2012. 144. Print.
Illes, Judika. Encylopedia of Spirits. New
York: Harper One, 2009.
Bartlett, Robert Allan. Real Alchemy: A Primer of Practical
Alchemy. 3rd. Lake Worth, FL: Ibis Press, 2009. 7-29. Print.
Flowers, Stephen Edred. Hermetic Magic: The Postmodern
Magical Papyrus of Arabis. 1st. York Beach, ME: Weiser, 1995. 102. Print.
Mathers, S.
Liddell Macgregor. "The Key of Solomon the King." Internet Sacred
Text Archive. Internet Sacred Text Archive, n.d. Web. 18 Nov 2012.
<http://www.sacred-texts.com/grim/kos/index.htm>.
Mathers, S.
Liddell Macgregor. "The Lesser Key of Solomon the King." Internet
Sacred Text Archive. Internet Sacred Text Archive, n.d. Web. 18 Nov 2012. <http://www.sacred-texts.com/grim/lks/index.htm>.
Burton, Sir Richard F. Arabian Nights: The Book of the
Thousand Nights and a Night. 1st. London: Barnes and Noble, 2007. 29-39,
111-142, 167-210, 423-472. Print.
Burton, Sir Richard F. The Book of the Thousand Nights and
a Night. 2nd. 1-3. New York: The Heritage Press, 1962. 47-54, 3655-3673.
Print.
Warner, Marina. Stranger
Magic: Charmed States and the Arabian Nights. 1st. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press, 2011. 36-54. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment